Major Issues in Education: 20 Hot Topics (From Grade School to College)
In America, all kinds of issues in education are big topics of discussion, both in the news media and among the general public. The current education system is beset by a wide range of challenges, from cuts in government funding to changes in disciplinary policies—and much more. Everyone agrees that providing high-quality education for our citizens is a worthy ideal. However, there are many diverse viewpoints about how that should be accomplished. And that leads to highly charged debates, with passionate advocates on both sides.
Understanding education issues is important for students, parents, and taxpayers. By being well-informed, you can contribute valuable input to the discussion. You can also make better decisions about what causes you will support or what plans you will make for your future.
This article provides detailed information on many of today's most relevant issues in primary, secondary, and post-secondary education. It also outlines four emerging trends that have the potential to shake up the education sector. You'll learn about:
- 13 major issues in education at the K-12 level
- 7 big issues in higher education
- 5 emerging trends in education
13 Major Issues in Education at the K-12 Level
America's elementary and secondary schools are facing a myriad of challenges. Several of the present issues of education are:
1. Government funding for education
On any list of current issues in education, school funding ranks near the top. As you may be aware, the American public education system is composed of primary and secondary schools that are supported by taxes. Over 90 percent of the funding for public K-12 schools comes from state and local governments. In the wake of the Great Recession, most states made cuts to funding for schools. That was understandable, since the bulk of state funding comes from revenues generated by sales and income taxes, both of which drop in times of recession.
However, many states are still giving schools less cash now than they did before the Great Recession. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that, as of the 2017-2018 academic year, 29 states were still spending less per K-12 student than they did a decade earlier.1 That's why the formulas that states use to fund schools have come under fire in recent years and have even been the subjects of lawsuits. For example, in 2017, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled that the legislature's formula for financing schools was unconstitutional because it didn't adequately fund education in the state.
Less funding means that smaller staffs, fewer programs, and diminished resources for students are common problems in school. In some cases, schools are unable to pay for essential maintenance. A 2017 report noted that close to a quarter of all U.S. public schools are in fair or poor condition and that 53 percent of schools need renovations and repairs.2 Plus, one survey discovered that teachers spent an average of $530 of their own money on classroom supplies.3
The issue reached a tipping point in 2018, with teachers in Arizona, Colorado, and other states walking off the job to demand additional educational funding. Some of the protests resulted in modest funding increases, but many educators believe that more must be done.
2. School safety
Over the past several years, a string of high-profile mass shootings in U.S. schools have resulted in dozens of deaths and led to debates about the best ways to keep students safe. In a poll conducted shortly after 17 people were killed in the shootings at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, 57 percent of teenagers said they were worried about the possibility of gun violence at their schools.4
Figuring out how to prevent such attacks and save the lives of students and school personnel are problems faced by teachers all across America.
President Trump and other lawmakers have suggested that allowing specially trained teachers and other school staff to carry concealed weapons would make schools safer. The idea is that adult volunteers who are already proficient with a firearm could undergo specialized training in how to deal with an active shooter situation until law enforcement can arrive. Proponents argue that armed staff could intervene to end the threat and save lives; in addition, potential attackers would be less likely to target a school if they knew that the school's personnel were carrying weapons.5
Critics argue that more guns in schools will lead to more accidents, injuries, and fear. They contend that there is scant evidence supporting the idea that armed school officials would be effective in countering attacks. Some data suggests that the opposite may be true: An FBI analysis of active shooter situations between 2000 and 2013 noted that law enforcement personnel who engaged the shooter suffered casualties in 21 out of 45 incidents.6 And those were highly trained professionals whose primary purpose was to maintain law and order. So it's highly unlikely that teachers, whose focus should be on educating children, would do any better in such situations.
According to the National Education Association (NEA), giving teachers guns is not the answer. In a March 2018 survey, 74 percent of NEA members opposed arming school personnel, and two-thirds said they would feel less safe at work if school staff were carrying guns. To counter gun violence in schools, the NEA supports measures like requiring universal background checks, preventing mentally ill people from purchasing guns, and banning assault weapons.7
3. Disciplinary policies
Data from the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights suggests that black students face disproportionately high rates of suspension and expulsion from school. For instance, in K-12 schools, black male students make up only eight percent of enrollees but account for 25 percent of suspensions.8 So, many people believe that some teachers are applying the rules of discipline in a discriminatory way and are thus contributing to what has been termed the "school-to-prison pipeline." That's because research has demonstrated that students who are suspended or expelled are significantly more likely to become involved with the juvenile justice system.9
In 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Department of Education issued guidelines for all public schools on how to develop disciplinary practices that reduce disparities and comply with federal civil rights laws. The guidelines urged schools to limit the use of exclusionary disciplinary tactics such as suspension and expulsion and adopt more positive interventions such as counseling and restorative justice strategies. The guidelines also specified that schools could face a loss of federal funds if they carried out policies that had a disparate impact on some racial groups.
Opponents argue that banning suspensions and expulsions takes away valuable tools that teachers can use to combat student misbehavior. They maintain that as long as disciplinary policies are applied the same way to every student regardless of race, such policies are not discriminatory. In fact, one major study found that the racial disparities in school suspension rates could be explained by the prior behavior of the students rather than by discriminatory tactics on the part of educators.10
In 2018, the Federal Commission on School Safety (which was established in the wake of the school shootings in Parkland, Florida) was tasked with reviewing and possibly rescinding the 2014 guidelines. According to a survey taken shortly after the announced review, only 27 percent of Americans support federal policies that limit racial disparities in school discipline.11
4. Technology in education
Technology in education is a powerful movement that is sweeping through schools nationwide. After all, today's students have grown up with digital technology and expect it to be part of their learning experience. But how much of a role should it play in education?
Proponents point out that educational technology offers the potential to engage students in more active learning, as evidenced in flipped classrooms. It can facilitate group collaboration and provide instant access to up-to-date resources. Teachers and instructors can integrate online surveys, interactive case studies, and relevant videos in order to offer content tailored to different learning styles. Indeed, students with special needs frequently rely on assistive technology to help them communicate and meaningfully access course materials.
But there are downsides as well. For instance, technology can definitely be a distraction. Some students tune out of lessons and spend time checking social media, playing games, or shopping online. One research study revealed that students who multitasked on a laptop during class scored 11 percent lower on an exam that tested their knowledge of the lecture. Students who sat behind those multitaskers scored 17 percent lower.12 In the fall of 2017, University of Michigan professor Susan Dynarski cited such research as one of the main reasons why she bans electronics in her classes.13
More disturbingly, technology can pose a real threat to student privacy and security. The collection of sensitive student data by education technology companies can lead to serious problems. In 2017, a group called Dark Overlord hacked into school district servers in several states and obtained access to students' personal information, including counselor reports and medical records. The group used the data to threaten students and their families with physical violence.14
5. Charter schools and voucher programs
School choice is definitely among the hot topics in education these days. U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is a vocal supporter of various forms of parental choice, including charter schools and school vouchers.
Charter schools are funded through a combination of public and private money and operate independently of the public system. They have charters (i.e., contracts) with school districts, states, or private organizations. These charters outline the academic outcomes that the schools agree to achieve. Like mainstream public schools, charter schools cannot teach religion or charge tuition, and their students must complete standardized testing. However, charter schools are not limited to taking students in a certain geographic area, and they have more autonomy to choose their teaching methods. They are also subject to less oversight and fewer regulations.
School vouchers are like coupons that allow parents to use public funds to send their child to the school of their choice, which can be private and may be either secular or religious. In many cases, vouchers are reserved for low-income students or students with disabilities.
Advocates argue that charter schools and school vouchers offer parents a greater range of educational options. Opponents say that they privatize education and siphon funding away from regular public schools that are already financially strapped. A poll conducted in May 2018 found that 44 percent of the general public supports the expansion of charter schools, while 35 percent oppose such a move. The same poll found that 54 percent of people support vouchers.11
6. Common Core
The Common Core State Standards is a set of academic standards for math and language arts that specify what public school students are expected to learn by the end of each year from kindergarten through 12th grade. Developed in 2009, the standards were designed to promote equity among public K-12 students, since all students would take standardized end-of-year tests and be held to the same internationally benchmarked standards. The idea was to institute a system that brought all schools up to the same level and allowed for comparison of student performance in different regions. Such standards would help all students with college and career readiness.
Some opponents see the standards as unwelcome federal intrusion into state control of education. Others are critical of the way the standards were developed with little input from experienced educators. Many teachers argue that the standards result in inflexible lesson plans that allow for less creativity and fun in the learning process.
Some critics also take issue with the lack of accommodation for non-traditional learners. The Common Core prescribes standards for each grade level, but students with disabilities or language barriers often need more time to fully learn the material.
The vast majority of states adopted the Common Core State Standards when they were first introduced. Since then, more than a dozen states have either repealed the standards or revised them to align better with local needs. In many cases, the standards themselves have remained virtually the same but given a different name.15
And a name can be significant. In a 2018 survey, a group of American adults was asked whether they supported common standards across states. About 61 percent replied that they did. But when another group was polled about Common Core specifically, only 45 percent said they supported it.11
7. Standardized testing
In the minds of many, educational reform means making changes to the system in order to ensure that students from all over the country measure up to the same set of standards. The theory behind standardized tests is that they provide an objective measure of student performance and can help ensure that all students become proficient in course material. Standardized testing was meant to hold public schools accountable if they failed to provide effective instruction to all students. Without such measures, it was argued, low-income and minority students would fall through the cracks and not receive the same quality education as their more affluent white counterparts.
During the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) years, schools—and teachers—were judged by how well students scored on such tests. Schools whose results weren't up to par faced intense scrutiny, and in some cases state takeover or closure. Teachers' effectiveness was rated by how much improvement their students showed on standardized exams. The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which took effect in 2016, removed the most punitive aspects of NCLB while maintaining the requirement to test students every year in Grades 3 to 8, and once in high school.
But many critics say that rampant standardized testing is one of the biggest problems in education. They argue that the pressure to produce high test scores has resulted in a teach-to-the-test approach to instruction in which other non-tested subjects (such as art, music, and physical education) have been given short shrift in order to devote more time to test preparation. And they contend that policymakers overemphasize the meaning of standardized test results, which don't present a clear or complete picture of overall student learning.
8. Teacher salaries
In most states, teacher pay has steadily eroded over the last several years. Data from the National Center for Education Statistics reveals that across the U.S., average salaries for public elementary and secondary school teachers actually dropped by close to five percent between the 2009-2010 school year and the 2016-2017 one. The decreases were especially pronounced in states like Oklahoma (17 percent) and Colorado (16 percent), both of which saw massive teacher walkouts in the spring of 2018.16
Of course, there were significant differences between states. In nine states, average salaries actually went up over that same time frame. For example, Vermont saw an increase of nine percent, and North Dakota saw salaries jump by seven percent.16 It's also important to note that public school teachers generally enjoy pensions and other benefits that make up a large share of their compensation.
But the growth in benefits has not been enough to balance out the overall low wages. An Economic Policy Institute report found that even after factoring in benefits, public-sector teachers face a compensation penalty of 11.1 percent relative to other college graduates.17
The 2018 teacher strikes did result in some modest gains. West Virginia teachers received a five-percent raise, and Arizona educators got a 20-percent bump spread over three years.
A survey conducted in May 2018 found that Americans' support for boosting teacher salaries was at its highest level since 2008. Among respondents who were first told what teachers in their state earned, 49 percent said that salaries should rise. That represented a 13-percentage-point increase over the previous year.11
9. The teaching of evolution
In the U.S., public school started as a means to spread religious ideals, but it has since become a strictly secular institution. And the debate over how to teach public school students about the origins of life has gone on for almost a century.
Today, Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection is accepted by virtually the entire scientific community, but it is still controversial among many Americans who maintain that living things were guided into existence. A pair of surveys from 2014 revealed that 98 percent of scientists aligned with the American Association for the Advancement of Science believed that humans evolved over time. But it also revealed that, overall, only 62 percent of American adults agreed.18
Over the years, some states have outright banned teachers from discussing evolution in the classroom. Others have mandated that students be allowed to question the scientific soundness of evolution, or that equal time be given to consideration of the Judeo-Christian notion of divine creation (i.e., creationism).
Some people argue that the theory of intelligent design—which posits that the complexities of living things cannot be explained by natural selection and can best be explained as resulting from an intelligent cause—is a legitimate scientific theory that should be allowed in public school curricula. They say it differs from creationism because it doesn't necessarily ascribe the design of life to a supernatural deity or supreme being.
Opponents contend that intelligent design is really just creationism in disguise and should not be taught in public schools because it is religiously motivated and has no credible scientific basis. And the courts have consistently held that the teaching of creationism and intelligent design promotes religious beliefs and therefore violates the Constitution's prohibition against the government establishment of religion. Still, the debate continues.
10. Teacher tenure
Having tenure means that a teacher cannot be let go unless his or her school district demonstrates just cause. Many states grant tenure to public school teachers who have received satisfactory evaluations for a specified period of time (which ranges from one to five years, depending on the state). A few states do not grant tenure at all. And the issue has long been mired in controversy.
Proponents argue that tenure protects teachers from being dismissed for personal or political reasons, such as disagreeing with administrators or teaching contentious subjects such as evolution. Tenured educators can advocate for students without fear of reprisal. Supporters also say that tenure gives teachers the freedom to try innovative methods of instruction in order to deliver more engaging educational experiences. Tenure also protects more experienced (and more expensive) teachers from being arbitrarily replaced with new graduates who earn lower salaries.
Critics contend that tenure makes it difficult to dismiss ineffectual teachers because going through the legal process of doing so is extremely costly and time-consuming. They say that tenure can encourage complacency, since teachers' jobs are secure whether they exceed expectations or just do the bare minimum. Plus, while the granting of tenure often hinges on teacher evaluations, research has found that, in practice, more than 99 percent of teachers receive ratings of satisfactory or better. Some administrators admit to being reluctant to give low ratings because of the time and effort required to document teachers' performance and provide support for improvement.19
In recent years, lawsuits challenging teacher tenure laws have been brought in several states. Suits were dismissed in California, New Jersey, and Minnesota. As of 2018, a legal challenge is still ongoing in New York.
Bullying continues to be a major issue in schools all across the U.S. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 21 percent of students in Grades 6 through 12 reported having been bullied at school, or on their way to or from school, in 2015. That figure is down from 32 percent in 2007, but it is still far too high.20
The good news is that the same study revealed that the percentage of students who said they had been bullied almost every day dropped from seven percent in 2007 to four percent in 2015. In addition, the percentage of students who reported the bullying to an adult increased from 36 percent to 43 percent over that same time period.20
But that still means that almost 60 percent of students are not reporting bullying. And that means children are suffering.
Bullied students experience a range of emotional, physical, and behavioral problems. They often feel angry, anxious, lonely, and helpless. They are frequently scared to go to school, leading them to suffer academically and develop a low sense of self-worth. They are also at greater risk of engaging in violent acts or suicidal behaviors.
Every state has anti-bullying legislation in place, and schools are expected to develop policies to address the problem. However, there are differences in how each state defines bullying and what procedures it mandates when bullying is reported. And only about a third of states call for school districts to include provisions for support services such as counseling for students who are victims of bullying (or are bullies themselves).21
Student poverty is a growing problem. Data from the National Center for Education Statistics shows that as of the 2014-2015 school year, low-income students comprised a majority (52 percent) of public school students in the U.S. That represented a significant increase from 2000-2001, when only 38 percent of students were considered low-income (meaning they qualified for free or discounted school lunches).16
The numbers are truly alarming: In 40 states, at least 40 percent of public school enrollees were eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches, and 18 of those states had student poverty rates of 50 percent or more.16
Low-income students tend to perform worse in school than their more affluent peers. Studies have shown that family income strongly correlates to student achievement on standardized tests.22 That may be partly because parents with fewer financial resources generally can't afford tutoring and other enrichment experiences that can boost student achievement. In addition, low-income children are much more likely to experience food instability, family turmoil, and other stressors that can negatively affect their academic success.23
All of this means that teachers are faced with instructional challenges that go beyond students' desires to learn.
13. Class size
As of the 2011-2012 school year, the average class size in U.S. public schools was 21.2 students at the elementary level and 26.8 students at the secondary level.16 But anecdotal reports suggest that, today, classrooms commonly have more than 30 students— sometimes as many as 40.
Conventional wisdom holds that smaller classes are beneficial to student learning. Teachers often argue that the size of a class greatly influences the quality of the instruction they are able to provide. Indeed, research has shown that smaller classes do lead to improved student outcomes, particularly for low-income and minority students in the early elementary grades.24
Many (but not all) states have regulations in place that impose limits on class sizes. However, those limits become increasingly difficult to maintain in an era of budget constraints. Reducing class sizes requires hiring more teachers and constructing new classrooms. And, arguably, allowing class sizes to expand can enable districts to absorb funding cuts without having to make reductions to other programs such as art and physical education.
Critics argue that smaller class sizes do not confer as much of an advantage as proponents claim and that the staggering cost of limiting class sizes makes such policies unworkable. For instance, Florida amended its constitution in 2002 to cap the size of classes at both the elementary and secondary level. A 2010 study of its effectiveness found that while the policy costs the state around $4 billion a year, it has resulted in no significant impact on test scores for students in Grades 4 through 8.25
7 Big Issues in Higher Education
In the American education system, problems are not limited to elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. Here are details on a few of the current education issues at the college level:
1. Student loan forgiveness
Here's how the American public education system works: Students attend primary and secondary school (which is free), then they have the option of going on to post-secondary training (which, for most students, is not free). So with costs continuing to rise at both public and private institutions of higher learning, student loan debt is one of the most prominent issues in education today. Statistics show that students who graduated from college in 2017 came out with an average debt load of $39,400, which was six percent higher than the previous year. As a whole, Americans owe close to $1.5 trillion in student loans.26
Currently, students who have received certain federal student loans and are on income-driven repayment plans can qualify to have their remaining balance forgiven if they haven't repaid the loan in full after 20 to 25 years, depending on the plan. Additionally, the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program allows qualified borrowers who go into public service careers (such as teaching, government service, social work, or law enforcement) to have their student debt cancelled after 10 years.
However, potential changes are in the works. The Trump administration wants to eliminate the PSLF program and consolidate all current income-repayment plans into one that offers student loan forgiveness after 15 years rather than 20 or 25. Meanwhile, a growing number of Democrats are advocating for free college as an alternative to student loans.
2. Completion rates
The large number of students who begin post-secondary studies but do not graduate continues to be an issue. According to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, the overall six-year college completion rate for the cohort entering college in 2011 was only 56.9 percent. Around 45 percent of students completed a credential at the same institution where they started their studies, and about another 12 percent finished at a different institution.27
The good news is that the report marks two straight years of increases, and the overall rate has now surpassed the pre-recession high of 56.1 percent.27
While the trend is headed the right way, there is still concern over the significant percentage of college students who do not graduate. After all, 43 percent of students who began college in 2011 had still not completed a degree or certificate six years later. Close to a third of them had dropped out entirely.
Significant costs are associated with starting college but not completing it. Many students end up weighed down by debt, and evidence suggests that those who do not complete their higher education are less able to repay loans.28 Plus, students miss out on formal credentials that could lead to higher earnings. Research shows that students who begin college but do not complete a degree have median weekly earnings of $774. By contrast, associate degree holders have median weekly wages of $836, and bachelor's degree recipients have median weekly earnings of $1,173.29
Students leave college for many reasons, but chief among them is money. To mitigate that, some institutions have implemented small retention or completion grants. Such grants are aimed at students who are close to graduating, have financial need, have used up all other sources of aid, owe a modest amount, and are at risk of dropping out due to lack of funds. One study found that around a third of the institutions who implemented such grants noted higher graduation rates among grant recipients.30
Mental health challenges among students are a growing concern. A survey from the spring of 2018 found that almost two-thirds of college students said they had experienced "overwhelming anxiety" within the previous 12 months, and almost 57 percent reported higher-than-average stress levels.31 The Center for Collegiate Mental Health noted that over a five-year span leading up to 2015, the number of college students who sought help from campus counseling centers increased by an average of 30 to 40 percent, even though enrollment grew by only five percent over that same time frame.32
Among students seeking treatment, anxiety and depression were by far the most common complaints. Even more disturbingly, the report noted that the number of students who sought treatment as a result of engaging in self-harm or having suicidal thoughts had increased steadily between 2010 and 2017.32
And some schools are struggling to keep up. A national survey of college and university counseling center directors found that the average student-to-clinician ratio on U.S. campuses was 1,737 to 1.33 Yet, the International Association of Counseling Services (IACS) recommends that universities and colleges should ideally have one counselor for every 1,000 to 1,500 students. So, in some cases, suffering students face long waits for treatment.
Sexual assault is a serious problem on American campuses. According to a study by the U.S. Department of Justice and the National Center for Education Statistics, the number of reported on-campus forcible sex offenses grew from 2,200 in 2001 to 6,700 in 2014.34 A separate report from 2015 found that close to 12 percent of all college students experienced unwanted sexual penetration or touching through force (i.e., being physically overcome or threatened with a weapon) or incapacitation (i.e., being unable to consent due to being drunk, high, or asleep).35
It's estimated that almost two-thirds of sexual assaults are not reported to law enforcement, so the actual number of incidents could be much higher.36
And the way that colleges and universities deal with sexual assault is undergoing changes. In 2011, the Obama administration set out guidelines that schools were to follow in order to comply with Title IX rules that prohibit sexual discrimination in education. The guidelines broadly defined sexual harassment as "unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature" and required administrators to investigate all cases of student-on-student sexual misconduct that occurred either on or off campus, regardless of whether any party lodged a formal complaint.
Administrators were also required to adjudicate such cases based on a preponderance of evidence, meaning that they had to believe that it was more likely than not that an accused was guilty in order to proceed with disciplinary action. The "clear and convincing" evidentiary standard, which required that administrators be reasonably certain that sexual violence or harassment occurred, was deemed unacceptable.
Critics argued that the guidelines failed to respect the due process rights of those accused of sexual misconduct. Research has found that the frequency of false sexual assault allegations is between two and 10 percent.37
In 2017, the Trump administration rescinded the Obama-era guidelines and signaled its intent to institute new regulations on how schools should handle sexual assault allegations. The proposed rules, which have not yet been formally published or finalized, would define sexual harassment more narrowly and would only require schools to investigate formal complaints about on-campus incidents that are officially filed with designated authorities, such as Title IX coordinators. The proposed rules would also allow schools the option of using the clear and convincing standard for conviction.
Victims' rights advocates say that such an approach would deter victims from coming forward and provide less protection. It remains to be seen what the final rules will be.
The use of trigger warnings in academia is a highly contentious issue. Trigger warnings are designed to notify students that upcoming course material contains concepts or images that may invoke psychological or physiological reactions in people who have experienced trauma. Some college instructors provide such warnings before introducing films, texts, or other content involving things like violence or sexual abuse. The idea is to give students advance notice so that they can psychologically prepare themselves.
Some believe that trigger warnings are essential because they allow vulnerable people to prepare for and navigate difficult content. Having warnings in place also allows students who are dealing with post-traumatic stress to decide whether they will engage with such material or seek out an alternative way to acquire the necessary information.
Critics argue that trigger warnings constrain free speech and academic freedom by discouraging the discussion of topics that might trigger distressing reactions in some students. They point out that college faculty already provide detailed course syllabi and that it's impossible to anticipate and acknowledge every potential trigger.
In 2015, NPR Ed surveyed more than 800 faculty members at higher education institutions across the U.S. and found that around half had given trigger warnings before bringing up potentially disturbing course material. Most did so on their own initiative, not in response to administrative policy or student requests.38 In fact, few schools either mandate or prohibit trigger warnings. One notable exception is the University of Chicago, which in 2016 informed all incoming first-year students that it did not support such warnings.
6. College accreditation
In order to participate in federal student financial aid programs, institutions of higher education must be accredited by an agency that is recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. By law, accreditors must consider factors such as an institution's facilities, equipment, curricula, admission practices, faculty, and support services. The idea is to enforce an acceptable standard of quality.
But while federal regulations require accreditors to assess each institution's "success with respect to student achievement," they don't specify how to measure such achievement. Accreditors are free to define that for themselves. Unfortunately, some colleges that have questionable practices, low graduation rates, and high student loan default rates continue to be accredited. Critics argue that accreditors are not doing enough to ensure that students receive good value for their money.
7. College rankings
Every year, prospective college students and their families turn to rankings like the ones produced by U.S. News & World Report to compare different institutions of higher education. Many people accept such rankings as authoritative without truly understanding how they are calculated or what they actually measure.
It's common for ranking organizations to refine their methodologies from year to year and change how they weigh various factors—which means it's possible for colleges to rise or fall in the rankings despite making no substantive changes to their programs or institutional policies. That makes it difficult to compare rankings from one year to the next, since things are often measured differently.
For colleges, a higher ranking can lead to more visibility, more qualified applicants, and more alumni donations (in short: more money). And the unfortunate reality is that, in their quest to outrank their competitors, some schools outright lie about test scores, graduation rates, or financial information.
Others take advantage of creative ways to game the system. For example, U.S. News looks at the test scores of incoming students at each institution, but it only looks at students who begin in the fall semester. So one school instituted a program whereby students with lower test scores could spend their first semester in a foreign country and return to the school in the spring, thus leaving them out of the calculations of U.S. News.39
Rankings do make useful information about U.S. colleges and universities available to all students and their families. But consumers should be cautious about blindly accepting such rankings as true measures of educational quality.
5 Emerging Trends in Education
What are the forces that will shape education in the years to come? Some of the new trends in education are:
1. Maker learning
The maker movement is rapidly gaining traction in K-12 schools across America. Maker learning is based on the idea that you will engage students in learning by encouraging interest-driven problem solving and hands-on activities (i.e., learning by doing). In collaborative spaces called makerspaces, students identify problems, dream up inventions, make prototypes, and keep tinkering until they come up with something that makes sense. It's a do-it-yourself educational approach that focuses on iterative trial and error and views failure as an opportunity to refine and improve.
Maker education focuses on learning rather than teaching. Students follow their own interests and test their own solutions. For example, that might mean creating a video game, building a rocket, designing historical costumes, or 3D-printing an irrigation system for a garden. It can involve high-tech equipment, but it doesn't have to. Repurposing whatever materials are on hand is an important ideal of the maker philosophy.
There is little hard data available on the maker trend. However, armed with a grant from the National Science Foundation, researchers at Rutgers University are currently studying the cognitive basis for maker education and investigating its connection to meaningful learning.40
2. Moving away from letter grades
Many education advocates believe that the traditional models of student assessment place too much emphasis on standardization and testing. They feel that traditional grading models do not sufficiently measure many of the skills that are most prized in the 21st-century workforce, such as problem solving, self-advocacy, and creativity. As a result, a growing number of schools around the U.S. are replacing A-F letter grades with new assessment systems.
Formed in 2017, the Mastery Transcript Consortium is a group of more than 150 private high schools that have pledged to get rid of grade-based transcripts in favor of digital ones that provide qualitative descriptions of student learning as well as samples of student work. Some of the most famous private institutions in America have signed on, including Dalton and Phillips Exeter.
The no-more-grades movement is taking hold in public schools as well. Many states have enacted policies aimed at encouraging public schools to use something other than grades to assess students' abilities. It's part of a larger shift toward what's commonly known as mastery-based or competency-based learning, which strives to ensure that students become proficient in defined areas of skill.
Instead of letter grades, report cards may feature phrases like "partially meets the standard" or "exceeds the standard." Some schools also include portfolios, capstone projects, or other demonstrations of student learning.
But what happens when it's time to apply to college? It seems that even colleges and universities are getting on board. At least 75 higher education institutions across New England (including Dartmouth and Harvard) have formally indicated that students who present competency-based transcripts will not be disadvantaged in any way during the admission process.
3. The rise of micro-credentials
Micro-credentials, also known as digital badges or nanodegrees, are mini-qualifications that demonstrate a student's knowledge or skills in a given area. Unlike traditional college degrees that require studying a range of different subjects over a multi-year span, micro-credentials are earned through short, targeted educational offerings that focus on specific skills in particular fields. They tend to be inexpensive (sometimes even free) and are typically taken online.
Some post-secondary schools are developing micro-credentialing partnerships with third-party learning providers, while other schools are offering such solutions on their own. According to one survey, around 20 percent of higher education institutions offer some type of alternative credentialing.41
Micro-credentials can serve as evidence that students have mastered particular skills, but the rigor and market worth of such credentials can vary significantly.42 Still, they are an increasingly popular way of unbundling content and providing it on demand.
4. Flipped classrooms
A growing number of schools are embracing the notion of flipped learning. It's an instructional approach that reverses the traditional model of the teacher giving a lecture in front of the class, then sending students home to work through assignments that enhance their understanding of the concepts. In flipped learning, students watch lecture videos or read relevant course content on their own before class, and class time is devoted to expanding on the material through group discussions and collaborative learning projects (i.e., doing what was traditionally meant as homework). The instructor is there to guide students when questions or problems arise.
Provided that all students have access to the appropriate technology and are motivated to prepare for each class session, flipped learning can bring a wide range of benefits. For example, it allows students to control their own learning by watching lecture videos at their own pace; they can pause, jot down questions, or re-watch parts they find confusing. The model also encourages students to learn from each other and explore subjects more deeply.
Flipped learning is becoming widespread in all levels of education, but it is especially prevalent at the college level. A 2017 survey found that 61 percent of college faculty were using the flipped model in some or all of their classes. That marked a six-percent increase over 2016. Another 24 percent of college instructors were either exploring the idea of flipped classes or actively planning to implement it.43
5. Social-emotional learning
There is a growing consensus that schools have a responsibility to foster students' social and emotional development along with their cognitive skills. Social-emotional learning (SEL) focuses on helping students develop the abilities to identify their strengths, manage their emotions, set goals, show empathy, make responsible decisions, and build and maintain healthy relationships. Research has shown that such skills play a key role in reducing anti-social behavior, boosting academic achievement, and improving long-term health.44
Every state has developed SEL competencies at the preschool level, and the number of states with such competencies for higher grades is growing. And according to the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL), at least 16 states should have SEL competencies articulated for K-12 by the end of 2019 (up from just one state in 2011).45
Explore Your Educational Options
Now that you've learned about current issues in education, you may want to start thinking about how to develop the skills you need for the future you want. If you're looking for post-secondary training, it's definitely worth your while to consider the focused programs offered by vocational colleges and technical schools. Discover options in your area by putting your zip code into the search tool below!
1 Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, "A Punishing Decade for School Funding," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
2 American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017 Infrastructure Report Card, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
3 Scholastic, "Teacher & Principal School Report: Educators' Funding Priorities & Personal Spending," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
4 Pew Research Center, "A majority of U.S. teens fear a shooting could happen at their school, and most parents share their concern," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
5 Personal Defense World, "The Case For Arming Teachers and the Reality of How It Works," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
6 U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, A Study of Active Shooter Incidents in the United States Between 2000 and 2013, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
7 NEAToday.org, "NEA Survey: Educators Say No to Arming Teachers, Favor Real Solutions to Gun Violence," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
8 U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights, "2015-2016 Civil Rights Data Collection: School Climate and Safety," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
9 Council of State Governments Justice Center, Breaking Schools' Rules: A Statewide Study of How School Discipline Relates to Students' Success and Juvenile Justice Involvement, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
10 Journal of Criminal Justice, "Prior problem behavior accounts for the racial gap in school suspensions," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
11 Education Next, "Public Support Climbs for Teacher Pay, School Expenditures, Charter Schools, and Universal Vouchers," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
12 Computers & Education, "Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
13 The New York Times, "Laptops Are Great. But Not During a Lecture or a Meeting," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
14 The Washington Post, "Education Department warns of new hacker threat as 'Dark Overlord' claims credit for attacks on school districts," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
15 Abt Associates, Common Core Revisions: What Are States Really Changing?, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
16 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
17 Economic Policy Institute, "The teacher pay penalty has hit a new high," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
18 Pew Research Center, "For Darwin Day, 6 facts about the evolution debate," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
19 Educational Researcher "Revisiting the Widget Effect: Teacher Evaluation Reforms and the Distribution of Teacher Effectiveness," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
20 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, "Changes in Bullying Victimization and Hate-Related Words at School Since 2007," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
21 American Psychological Association, "Do U.S. laws go far enough to prevent bullying at school?," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
22 The Conversation, "Students' test scores tell us more about the community they live in than what they know," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
23 Stressing Out the Poor: Chronic Physiological Stress and the Income-Achievement Gap, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
24 National Education Policy Center, Research-Based Options for Education Policymaking: The Effectiveness of Class Size Reduction, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
25 The Impact of a Universal Class-Size Reduction Policy: Evidence from Florida's Statewide Mandate, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
26 Student Loan Hero, "A Look at the Shocking Student Loan Debt Statistics for 2018," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
27 National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Signature Report 14: Completing College: A National View of Student Completion Rates—Fall 2011 Cohort, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
28 Third Way, The College Completion Landscape: Trends, Challenges, and Why it Matters, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
29 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections, "Unemployment rates and earnings by educational attainment, 2017," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
30 Coalition of Urban Serving Universities (USU) and the Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities (APLU), Foiling the Drop-out Trap: Completion Grant Practices for Retaining and Graduating Students, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
31 American College Health Association, National College Health Assessment II: Undergraduate Student Reference Group: Executive Summary, Spring 2018, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
32 Center for Collegiate Mental Health, 2017 Annual Report, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
33 The Association for University and College Counseling Center Directors Annual Survey, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
34 U.S. Department of Justice and the National Center for Education Statistics, Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2016, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
35 The Association of American Universities, Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
36 National Sexual Violence Resource Center, Statistics About Sexual Violence, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
37 Violence Against Women, "False Allegations of Sexual Assault: An Analysis of Ten Years of Reported Cases," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
38 NPR Ed, "Half of Professors in NPR Ed Survey Have Used 'Trigger Warnings'," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
39 Boston, "How to Game the College Rankings," website last visited on November 26, 2019.
40 National Science Foundation, "Eager: Maker: The origins of making: A Data Science Approach to Investigating Cognitive and Affective Basis of Learning through Constructing," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
41 Pearson Education and UPCEA, Demographic Shifts in Educational Demand and the Rise of Alternative Credentials, website last visited on November 13, 2018.
42 Class Central, "Analysis of 450 MOOC-Based Microcredentials Reveals Many Options But Little Consistency," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
43 Campus Technology, "Survey: Blended Learning on the Rise," website last visited on November 13, 2018.
44 Child Development, "The Impact of Enhancing Students' Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions," website last visited on November 14, 2018.
45 CASEL, 2018 State Scorecard Scan, website last visited on November 14, 2018.